References

Alajlan A, Shapiro J, Rivers JK Paradoxical hypertrichosis after laser epilation. J Am Acad Dermatol.. 2005; 53:(1)85-88 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2004.06.054

Altshuler GB, Anderson RR, Manstein D Extended theory of selective photothermolysis. Lasers Surg Med.. 2001; 29:(5)416-432

Anderson RR, Parrish JA. The optics of human skin. J Invest Dermatol.. 1981; 77:(1)13-19 https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12479191

Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science. 1983; 220:(4596)524-527 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6836297

Bjerring P, Zachariae H, Lybecker H Evaluation of the free-running ruby laser for hair removal. A retrospective study. Acta Derm Venereol.. 1998; 78:(1)48-51

Chandrasekhar S. Radiative Transfer.New York: Dover Publications; 1960

Cotsarelis G, Sun TT, Lavker RM. Label-retaining cells reside in the bulge area of pilosebaceous unit: implications for follicular stem cells, hair cycle, and skin carcinogenesis. Cell. 1990; 61:(7)1329-1337 https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(90)90696-c

Dierickx CC. Hair removal by lasers and intense pulsed light sources. Dermatol Clin.. 2002; 20:(1)135-146

Drosner M, Adatto M. Photo-epilation: guidelines for care from the European Society for Laser Dermatology (ESLD). J Cosmet Laser Ther.. 2005; 7:(1)33-38 https://doi.org/10.1080/14764170410003002

Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol.. 1988; 124:(6)869-871 https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.124.6.869

Grossman MC, Dierickx C, Farinelli W Damage to hair follicles by normal-mode ruby laser pulses. J Am Acad Dermatol.. 1996; 35:(6)889-894 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0190-9622(96)90111-5

Haedersdal M, Wulf HC. Evidence-based review of hair removal using lasers and light sources. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol.. 2006; 20:(1)9-20 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2005.01327.x

Jacques SL, Prahl SA. Modeling optical and thermal distributions in tissue during laser irradiation. Lasers Surg Med.. 1987; 6:(6)494-503

Johnson F, Dovale M. Intense pulsed light treatment of hirsutism: case reports of skin phototypes V and VI. J Cutan Laser Ther.. 1999; 1:(4)233-237

llumination geometry: the importance of laser beam spatial characteristics. Laser hair removal technical note no. 2. 2000. https://kipdf.com/illumination-geometry-the-importance-of-laser-beam-spatial-characteristics_5ab089e31723dd339c8055ad.html (accessed 14 August 2019)

Kline. Beauty devices: global market analysis and opportunities. 2019. http://www.klinegroup.com/reports/beauty_devices.asp (accessed 14 August 2019)

Kontoes P, Vlachos S, Konstantinos M Hair induction after laser-assisted hair removal and its treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol.. 2006; 54:(1)64-67 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2005.09.034

Lepselter J, Elman M. Biological and clinical aspects in laser hair removal. J Dermatolog Treat. 2004; 15:(2)72-83 https://doi.org/10.1080/09546630310023152

Manstein D, Pourshagh M, Anderson R. Effects of fluence and pulse duration for flashlamp exposure on hair follicles. Lasers Surg Med.. 2001; 28

Moreno-Arias G, Castelo-Branco C, Ferrando J. Paradoxical effect after IPL photoepilation. Dermatol Surg.. 2002; 28:(11)1013-1016

Purba TS, Haslam IS, Poblet E Human epithelial hair follicle stem cells and their progeny: current state of knowledge, the widening gap in translational research and future challenges. Bioessays. 2014; 36:(5)513-525 https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201300166

Sachdeva S. Fitzpatrick skin typing: applications in dermatology. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol.. 2009; 75:(1)93-96

Town G, Bjerring P. Is paradoxical hair growth caused by low-level radiant exposure by home-use laser and intense pulsed light devices?. J Cosmet Laser Ther.. 2016; 18:(6)355-362 https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2016.1157373

Town G, Botchkareva NV, Uzunbajakava NE Light-based home-use devices for hair removal: why do they work and how effective they are?. Lasers Surg Med.. 2019; 51:(6)481-490 https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23061

Wilson BC, Adam G. A Monte Carlo model for the absorption and flux distributions of light in tissue. Med Phys.. 1983; 10:(6)824-830 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.595361

Intense pulsed light (IPL) and laser hair reduction

02 September 2019
Volume 8 · Issue 7

Abstract

Demand for long-term hair reduction treatments has increased dramatically around the world in recent years, due to traditional factors, fashion, sport, wellbeing and health requirements. Some of the most popular options include laser and intense pulsed light (IPL) treatments, which are often administered by aesthetic practitioners. This article will discuss the hair growth cycle, as well as treatment options, parameters and outcomes.

Experience since the introduction of laser and intense pulsed light (IPL) treatments for long-term hair reduction has shown that almost all skin types, including European, Asian and Middle-Eastern, respond well to treatment (Johnson and Dovale, 1999; Dierickx, 2002). Varying cultural influences, including traditional factors, fashion, sport, personal feelings of wellbeing and health requirements, have dramatically increased demand around the world, from both women and men, for long-term hair reduction.

Only very dark skin types, particularly Afro-Caribbean and some South Asian skin types, are problematic because the high levels of melanin in the epidermis absorb light energy in competition with the targeted melanin or haemoglobin in the hair follicle. Ginger, blonde and grey/white hair responds poorly to light-based treatments in hair reduction.

The need for a rapid, non-invasive method to remove unwanted body and facial hair led to the use of lasers by medical practitioners in the late 1980s and to the development of professional intense pulsed broadband light devices, which first entered the US market in 1994 (Grossman et al, 1996). Since then, numerous manufacturers have developed competitive systems resulting in a dramatic price reduction. Lower prices, technological advances and a lack of regulatory controls on IPL devices have popularised their use among beauty therapists and salon owners as well as many private medical practitioners in many countries. Miniaturisation of opto-mechanical components and recognition that low-energy hair-reduction appliances were effective in achieving hair-growth delay also led to the development of simple, portable home-use devices entering the market in 2006 (Kline, 2019; Town et al, 2019).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Journal of Aesthetic Nurses and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for aesthetic nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month