References

American Society of Plastic Surgeons. New statistics reveal the shape of plastic surgery. 2018. https://tinyurl.com/y7lasqo3 (accessed 17 January 2019)

Buckingham E, Glasgold R, Kontis T Volume rejuvenation of the lower third, perioral, and jawline. Facial Plastic Surgery. 2015; 31:(01)070-079 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1544945

Burns A, Dover J, Gregory R, Zelickson B. Nonsurgical skin tightening modalities. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2007; 27:(4)423-432 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2007.05.009

Carruthers A, Carruthers J. A validated facial grading scale: the future of facial ageing measurement tools?. Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy. 2010; 12:(5)235-241 https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2010.514920

Choi SY, Lee YH, Kim H A combination trial of intradermal radiofrequency and hyaluronic acid filler for the treatment of nasolabial fold wrinkles: a pilot study. Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy. 2013; 16:(1)37-42 https://doi.org/10.3109/14764172.2013.854636

Coleman S, Grover R. The anatomy of the aging face: volume loss and changes in 3-dimensional topography. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2006; 26:(1)S4-S9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2005.09.012

De Boulle K, Heydenrych I. Patient factors influencing dermal filler complications: prevention, assessment, and treatment. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology. 2015; https://doi.org/10.2147/ccid.s80446

Fallacara A, Manfredini S, Durini E, Vertuani S. Hyaluronic acid fillers in soft tissue regeneration. Facial Plastic Surgery. 2017; 33:(01)087-096 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1597685

Hamman MS, Goldman MP. Minimizing bruising following fillers and other cosmetic injectables. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2013; 6:(8)16-18

John HE, Price RD. Perspectives in the selection of hyaluronic acid fillers for facial wrinkles and aging skin. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2009; 3:225-230

Ko EJ, Choi HG, Kim H Novel treatment using intradermal radiofrequency and hyaluronic acid filler to correct marionette lines. Annals of Dermatology. 2015; 27:(3) https://doi.org/10.5021/ad.2015.27.3.351

Satisfying patient expectations with soft-tissue augmentation. 2009. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/94t0r445

Srivastava D, Singh H, Mishra S Facial asymmetry revisited: Part I-diagnosis and treatment planning. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2018; 8:(1)7-14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2017.04.010

Vedamurthy M, Vedamurthy A, Nischal K. Dermal fillers: Dos and Donts. Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery. 2010; 3:(1) https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2077.63221

Yutskovskaya YA, Sergeeva AD, Kislitsyna AI, Landau M. Contouring of lower face and chin in consideration of facial morphotypes and shapes-is it a moreaccurate approach?. Madridge J Dermatol Res. 2017; 2:(1)26-31 https://doi.org/10.18689/mjdr-1000107

Jawline augmentation: the important final piece in restoring balance in the ageing face

02 February 2019
Volume 8 · Issue 1

Abstract

When tackling signs of ageing, a holistic approach is required. Focusing on some areas of the face and neglecting others can leave the face looking unbalanced, and can mitigate the effects of treatment. One area that is sometimes overlooked by patients and practitioners alike is the jawline. Paying attention to this area can result in greater overall results and increased patient satisfaction—it is the important final piece in restoring balance in the ageing face. However, repairing the jawline without proper attention to the upper and midface may result in a less than optimal result. This article will explore the ageing process and its effect on the jawline, how to restore the natural balance of the face, patient consultation and assessment, and the required technique. Outcomes are discussed.

The use of soft tissue fillers to restore volume to the face and tackle the signs of ageing continues to be on the rise. According to the American Society of Plastic Surgery (ASPS), injectable fillers were used in 2.69 million procedures in 2017 (ASPS, 2018). This is up three percent from 2016 (ASPS, 2018). Aesthetic nurses have become much more skilled in replacing volume to restore the balance of the face, rather than filling creases. Many advances were made in the field with the understanding of midface augmentation to replace volume lost in the lateral malar and apex regions of the cheek to lift the nasolabial fold and lower face area. However, more recent understanding of the effects of restoring the jawline have given consumers a much higher rate of satisfaction in nonsurgical facial rejuvenation.

In order to understand how to restore this natural balance, it is important to understand the changes that are happening in the ageing face. The intrinsic factors that contribute to the ageing process are ones that show the most effect on the lower face and jawline. The ageing craniofacial skeleton is not only a result of bone atrophy, but also of the changes in the height and width of the face, as some bones expand and some lose mass over time. An increase in facial width and depth may be noted due to changes in the maxilla and mandible, as is a decrease in facial height. Mandibular changes are noted with any loss of teeth which causes marked resorption of the alveolar ridge and shape, and projection of the chin will also change with age. There is a general coarsening of mandibular bony protuberances at the points of insertion of masticatory muscles and a general softening elsewhere.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Journal of Aesthetic Nurses and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for aesthetic nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month