References

A meta-analysis of the evidence for assisted therapy with platelet-rich plasma for atrophic acne scars. 2019. 10.1007/s00266-019-01471-w

The role of topical probiotics on skin conditions: a systematic review of animal and human studies and implications for future therapies. 2019. 10.1111/exd.14032

Noncollagen dermal fillers: a summary of the clinical trials used for their FDA approval. 2019. 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002141

Platelet-rich plasma treatment for melasma: a pilot study. 2019. 10.1111/jocd.13157

Isotretinoin and risk factors for suicide attempt: a population-based comprehensive case series and nested case-control study using 2010–2014 French health insurance data. 2019. 10.1111/jdv.16005

Research Roundup

02 November 2019
Volume 8 · Issue 9

Abstract

In this regular feature, aesthetic nurse Claudia McGloin presents a brief synopsis of a range of recently published articles on medical aesthetics. Research roundup aims to provide an overview, rather than a detailed summary and critique, of the papers selected. Should you wish to look at any of the papers in more detail, a full reference is provided at the end of each study summary

There are a variety of studies available involving the role of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as an assisted therapy for atrophic acne scars. On closer examination, the results of these studies were varied and there was no current meta-analysis found that looked particularly at atrophic acne scar treatment.

The objective of this study was to complete a meta-analysis assessing improvements in the side effects of PRP, as well as the effect of assisted therapy for atrophic acne scars. To carry this out, the study followed PRISMA guidelines and a full comprehensive search literature was carried out in September 2018 using the electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library. As a result, seven articles were included in this review and all of the studies published used PRP as additive therapy.

The results of the study included treatments such as fractional carbon laser therapy and microneedling. There was a reported four degrees of improvement in five of the studies, which had 249 participants. In four of the studies (with 200 participants), there was a reported mean improvement. A significantly higher amount of improvement was shown in the PRP group compared to the control group. There were fewer side effects, including erythema and edema noted in the PRP groups; however, there was no significance in the findings.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Journal of Aesthetic Nurses and reading some of our peer-reviewed resources for aesthetic nurses. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Limited access to clinical or professional articles

  • New content and clinical newsletter updates each month